I am a single man. I have been single my entire life,
though I do not lack for the experience of having shared intimacy (and in one
case, a roof) with other members of the gender opposite mine. When I was in my twenties, and through my thirties,
many thought of bachelors like me as the “ideal”, and even seemed to look at me
and my kind with a bit of envy, as my father did shortly before he departed
this mortal coil. As I’ve aged, however
– I’m in my late forties now – people are starting to look at me
differently. They see the growing
presence of gray streaks in my long hair and in my beard (when I decide to grow
it out), the look at the texture of my facial skin and my hands which suggest
advancing age, they observe my darkening vocal tones and speech, and see me
alone, with no one in tow. Some back
off from me as a result, I suspect, thinking that if I’m this old and still
alone, then something must really be
wrong with me. I’m seen as a bit
creepy, a bit – oh, what’s the word? – off. Something must really be wrong with me, they
likely think.
The truth of it is, I never
really made pursuing a life partner my life’s pursuit. Sure, life for two can have its advantages,
especially if the relationship represents a perfect match (which I submit, are extremely rare.) And life for two, especially if that life is
certified with a marriage license, has a bevy of goodies not available to
singles: tax breaks, special legal treatments like privileged communications,
increased social standing, etc. Some
sources, such as from authors like Bella De Paulo, cite over 1,100
married-exclusive legal and fiscal benefits.
Marital supremacy rears itself in many other way as well: employment,
military, and other sectors of society are affected by this yay-for-marriage
attitude.
I don’t need to get into,
however, all of the pitfalls and pratfalls of life for two. The emotional roller-coasters which ride on,
and on, and on. The constant
compromises. The realization that we’re
growing apart from each other and unwilling to acknowledge it, lest we lose all
those bennies – the relationship of convenience. The social ramifications associated with
broken relationships and divorce. I’ve
been there, and done that. And I’m no
longer in an active pursuit mode.
As I spent some time reading
through Bella De Paulo’s Singlism, I’m
reminded of the lyrics of a song written by the great tune-smith Rupert
Holmes. Lullaby For Myself, which you can hear off of 1977’s Streisand Superman, spends most of the
song extolling the virtues of the unattached life:
>You don’t have to compromise
your taste for champagne and cheese when your partner craves the plainness of
pork chops;
>You learn that twice the
earning doesn’t necessarily mean twice the fun;
>No one is marking your time
when you come home at four in the morning;
>And many other things for
which you should consult with the lyric sheet contained within the album.
He’s leading us singles right
down what he thinks is the primrose path.
Sure, the song’s subject is female, having likely been commissioned by
Streisand for either the album or for the previous year’s A Star Is Born. But it
applies to us males, as well: no jailer to mark your time, your refrigerator
can contain whatever you want it to – including unintentional science projects –
without reprisals, and other features of single-minded freedom. He makes it sound like yeah, this is the
perfect life (which I’m agreeing with – right on Rupert! Sing it, Barbra!) But then, the last verse of the song sends
the singleton’s hope for BJS-branded affirmation right over the cliff: she’s singing that she would be grateful for “one
damned man” to “share the need to be alone with me.” With that line, Holmes encapsulates the
common perception, at least to academics like De Paulo, of older singles in
today’s hitched world. We say we love
to fly alone, but secretly pine for somebody to fly with.
I’m left to ask: What
about those that don’t have a burning need for someone “to be alone with me”? What about those that are the “self-contained
and self-content” types? Who is writing
music from that perspective? I don’t
hear too much of it, at least from the artists I listen to (which are
comparatively old-school compared to what is coming out today).
Singles can and do lead
perfectly purpose-driven, full lives, without the need of a partner. Their successes in life prove that coupling
is not a necessity to greatness or a fulfilled life. Remember that preacher from the Levant from
about 2,000 years ago, whose name is screamed from on high by some of the world’s
biggest hypocrites and frauds, but whose example is led by some of our greatest
examples of humanity? He was a
singleton. So was Beethoven, the Wright
Brothers, and Thoreau. Alvin Ailey and Nikola
Tesla are also among the ranks of the unhitched. Many, many others who have achieve greatness
while never having taken that fateful walk down the alley can be easily
googled.
I’ll have much more to say about
this topic in the coming months. It may
make its way in my other blogs, so stay tuned.